Photos 

< Previous   (1 of 27)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

< Previous   (2 of 27)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

< Previous   (3 of 27)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

< Previous   (4 of 27)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

< Previous   (5 of 27)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

< Previous   (6 of 27)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

< Previous   (7 of 27)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

< Previous   (8 of 27)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

< Previous   (9 of 27)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

View high-res version

< Previous   (10 of 27)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

View high-res version

< Previous   (11 of 27)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

< Previous   (12 of 27)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

< Previous   (13 of 27)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

View high-res version

< Previous   (14 of 27)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

View high-res version

< Previous   (15 of 27)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

< Previous   (16 of 27)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

< Previous   (17 of 27)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

< Previous   (18 of 27)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

View high-res version

< Previous   (19 of 27)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

< Previous   (20 of 27)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

< Previous   (21 of 27)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

< Previous   (22 of 27)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

< Previous   (23 of 27)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

< Previous   (24 of 27)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

< Previous   (25 of 27)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

< Previous   (26 of 27)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

< Previous   (27 of 27)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

Map 

Vicinity Map

Vicinity map

Map links:

Facts 

Overview
Lost cantilevered through truss bridge over Smith River on US 199
Location
Del Norte County, California
Status
Replaced by new bridge
History
Built 1929; damaged by an oversized truck on March 31, 1989; demolished August 1989
Builder
- Parker-Schram Co. (contractor)
Design
Cantilevered through truss
Dimensions
Total length: 615 ft.
Deck width: 24 ft.
Approximate latitude, longitude
+41.80639, -124.08222   (decimal degrees)
41°48'23" N, 124°04'56" W   (degrees°minutes'seconds")
Approximate UTM coordinates
10/410101/4628846 (zone/easting/northing)
USGS topographic map
Hiouchi
Inventory numbers
CA 1-06 (California bridge number)
BH 36687 (Bridgehunter.com ID)

Categories 

Built 1929 (468)
Built during 1920s (4,128)
California (1,065)
Cantilevered truss (123)
Del Norte County, California (8)
Formerly NR-eligible (76)
Lost (855)
Parker-Schram Co. (1)
Replaced by new bridge (699)
Through truss (5,419)
Total length 500-1000 feet (1,026)
Truss (16,067)

Update Log 

Sources 

Comments 

Post a comment here · Contact webmaster